reviews of Underworks Long-Cut Binder White

On Nov 26, 2006, jacksonic wrote
I've had this chest binder for a few weeks. I am about a 38 B/C, and although my chest looks wonderfuly flat and pec-cy in it, it is EXTREMELY uncomfortable. My breasts are not the issue-- because I have wide hips compared to my waist, the bottom 6-8 inches roll up and make a super-tight giant rubber band around my waist. It would improve the design of this binder if the bottom few inches were ringed with a stiff no-roll band. I ended up rolling the bottom of the binder up around a belt which made a weird lump around my waist (visible for my performance.) I wrote Underworks, the manufacturer, about the issue, and they recommended their tritop binder, which is also available on this site. (They would have let me exchange it but I had already washed it.) I am trying the tritop binder next, which is cropped, so it won't roll up around my waist. In general, the chest binder was of high quality, strong and well-made, it just didn't have the right logisitics for the shape of my body, if you get my drift, so I'm willing to try another Underworks product. If your waist is not much smaller than your hips, this binder might work for you.

On Jan 15, 2010, candycanekisses wrote
Like all sex toys, binders are really a matter of personal choice. I began binding with the long-cut binder, but quickly switched to the tri-top. This binder rolled up quite a bit, but didn't as much when I was wearing boxers and tucked it in. I also find that it's a lot harder to get a flat chest in this binder; the compression does not seem as "strong" and I find it hard to position my lumpy bits in such a way that they flatten. I sometimes use this binder over the tri-top to narrow my hips a little bit.

Please login or register to submit a review.